Written chords are all forms of chords that are reduced to writing, in a particular format. This is the series of promises and conditions of an agreement that is reduced on paper, in a simple composition of text, and is explicit. Valid written agreements have greater probative value in court because they are easier to read and understand. It is also simpler and more enforceable in court or in litigation The Indian Contract Act, 1872 imposes the Contract Act in India and is the key legal act to regulate the law of Indian contracts. The law is based on the principles of English common law. It applies to all states of India. It determines the circumstances under which the commitments made by the parties are legally binding. In accordance with Section 2 (h), the Indian Contracts Act defines a contract as a legally applicable agreement. This was done by Delhi High Court, in the case of Nanak Builders and Investors Pvt.
Ltd. vs. Vinod Kumar Alag AIR 1991 Delhi 315, the court having decided that even an oral agreement can be a valid and enforceable contract. Therefore, it is not strictly necessary, in the strict sense, for a contract to be entered into in writing, unless the parties themselves are considering reducing the terms of the contract. There are other laws in the country that disqualify some people from awarding contracts. You are:- An oral agreement is as valid as a written agreement. The legality of an oral agreement cannot be questioned if it falls within the indecency of the requirements of paragraph 10 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872. In conclusion, oral agreements are legally applicable in court or in litigation. However, it is strongly recommended that agreements or contracts be reduced to a text composition. Oral chords are acceptable, but also extremely difficult to prove. It is and has always been on several evidence when they all point in a certain direction.
a r e n n t is p r o m o e o s o s n s i a t o n t. “Displaystyle agreement-promised consideration.” 5. Factual error (section 20): “If both parties to an agreement have an error as to a fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is not concluded.” A party cannot be relieved because it has done a particular act in ignorance of the law. The error can be a bilateral error if both parties to an agreement are wrong. The error must be about an issue that is essential to the agreement. Section 11 of the Indian Contracts Act states that any person is uitable to be contractually, provided that: 2. Undue influence (section 16): “If a person who is able to control the will of another to enter into a contract with him and the transaction seems at first sight unacceptable, the burden of proof is that such a contract was not caused by an undue influence on the person who is capable of on the other. Treaty enforcement is a major problem in India, as the judicial system can be slow and contested.  India ranks 163rd out of 191 countries surveyed by the World Bank on the simple application of a treaty.  It is important to note that all contracts are valid agreements, but not all contracts are considered valid contracts.